• Call for application and application form

    Publications › Other -
    Procedure for granting rights of use available in the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz bands – Call for application and application form - Instructions for the candidates relating to the application form.
  • Microsoft Word version of the application form

    Publications › Form -
    Procedure for granting rights of use available in the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz bands – Microsoft Word Version of the Application Form
  • Draft decision on the restitution of the 3G licence of Telenet Tecteo BidCo

    Publications › Consultation -
    The deadline for replying is 11 July 2014, included. The contact person is Michaël Vandroogenbroek (02 226 88 11). Address: consult02@bipt.be. Answers shall be sent by e-mail exclusively to the address indicated. The subject of the e-mail shall at least mention the reference "Consult-2014-F2".
  • Decision of the BIPT Council on radio interfaces B10-05, B10-06, B10-08 and E27-01

    Publications › Decision -
    Radio interfaces B10-05, B10-06, B10-08 and E27-01.
  • Procedure for granting rights of use available in the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz bands : information memorandum

    Publications › Other -
    This memorandum provides informal information to those candidates wishing to take part in the procedure for the granting of user rights available for the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz bands. This is for your information only. The existing legislation is binding and takes precedence over the memorandum.
  • Stimulation of the mobile broadband take-up in Belgium

    Publications › Other -
    In this study BIPT had examined how mobile broadband penetration could be promoted in Belgium. This study builds on an earlier study from 2010 about mobile data use in Belgium. In the meantime because of increasing competition and price cuts the market situation has evolved considerably. A number of questions are still very topical in this context: How does the Belgian broadband penetration position itself nowadays in Europe? What factors can explain the current position? What bottlenecks still remain? And above all: what recommendations and action points can be deduced from this?
  • Consultation held by the BIPT Council on 27 May 2014 regarding the draft communication of BIPT on the issue of the identification of the postal service provider having treated the item

    Publications › Consultation -
    In accordance with the Postal Act (Article 148bis, §2 of the Act of 21 March 1991), postal service providers shall commit themselves to comply with "the obligation to make it possible for the population to identify the persons in charge of the delivery of postal items and ensure that the postal items, with the exception of newspapers, bear a mark allowing the identification of the service provider that treated this item". By virtue of the legal prescription, each postal service provider involved in the transport process of postal items should therefore mark the postal items in order to allow its identification. However, this marking obligation can make the operational processes more complex and therefore result in additional costs. BIPT wishes to obtain the opinion of the different parties (operators, consumer associations, etc.) concerned by this marking issue. Answers to this consultation are expected during the four weeks of this publication, by Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at the latest.
  • Consultation of 23 May 2014 requested by the BIPT Council regarding its draft communication about the obligation to notify oneself as an operator to BIPT

    Publications › Consultation -
    The purpose of this communication is to explain the notion of "operator" as well as the hypotheses in which a person has to submit a notification to BIPT as an operator. This communication is not exhaustive and will evolve according to the specific cases BIPT will be confronted with, the feedback from stakeholders and the need to study certain notions in depth. This communication is based on the principles that apply. This does not exclude the fact that in some specific cases BIPT may still adopt ad hoc decisions.  To respond to this document, mail to: consult09@bipt.be (reference: consult-2014-E9). Contact Person: Philippe Appeldoorn, First Engineer-Advisor (02 226 88 51).
  • Decision of 20 May 2014 – Administrative fine imposed on Belgacom for non-compliance with the transparency obligation, in the context of the WBA VDSL2 reference offer

    Dossier -
    This decision imposes a fine on Belgacom for not having complied with its transparency obligation pursuant to various decisions on the markets for broadband access.
  • BIPT imposes a 403,000 EUR fine on Belgacom

    Publications › Press release -
    The technical specifications in a Belgacom reference offer for business customers did not correspond with the reality observed in the field.
Back to top