Consumers: 141 results found Export XML

This decision and its complement of 18 December 2007 (concerning tariffs, among other things) designate Belgacom Mobile, Mobistar and Base as operators with significant market power on the wholesale markets for mobile call termination and therefore impose on them a series of obligations to fulfil.

This decision establishes the regulatory framework for five markets related to the fixed telephony: The market for national telephony services (retail sale, residential and non-residential customers) The market for international telephony services (retail sale, residential and non-residential customers) The market for call origination (VAS and CS/CPS) The fixed call termination market (FTR) The transit services market

This decision on the definition of the migration volumes in the BRUO offer was annulled by the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 6 October 2009 following an appeal lodged by Belgacom.

This decision designates Belgacom (now: Proximus) as having significant market power and imposes a series of obligations to fulfil on the operator.

This decision on the tie cables in the BRUO offer was annulled by a judgement of the Court of Appeal of 20 October 2006.

This decision on the 2006 BRIO offer was annulled in part by the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 27 June 2008 following an appeal filed by Belgacom, which then withdrew concerning the remainder of the action (judgement of 3 March 2009).

This decision is about the 2006 BROBA offer. Following an appeal lodged by Belgacom, an interlocutory judgement was given about it by the Brussels Court of Appeal on 31 March 2009.

This decision establishes the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and the hourly labour costs (HMC) taken into consideration in the reference offers of Belgacom (BRIO, BRUO, BROBA) for 2006.

This decision is about the 2006 BRUO offer. Following an appeal lodged by Belgacom, an interlocutory judgement about it was given by the Court of Appeal on 31 March 2009.

This decision on the Happy Time tariff plan of Belgacom was extended by the decision of 9 November 2005. It was subject to two judgements of the Court of Appeal (22 June 2006 and 21 September 2006) following appeals filed by Base and Belgacom respectively.