Consumers: 141 results found Export XML

These interim measures to achieve the end-to-end connectivity between Belgacom Mobile and Base were extended by the decision of 11 October 2005.

This decision on the BRIO tariffs for access to value-added services was annulled by the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 23 October 2007 following an appeal filed by Belgacom

This decision on the tariffs for Customer-sited IC links and ATAP was annulled by the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 9 May 2008 following an appeal filed by Belgacom.

This decision concerns a dispute between The Phone Company and Belgacom Mobile on the use of GSM Gateway. It obliges Belgacom Mobile to continue allowing The Phone Company to access its network.

This decision on the interconnection tariff of Versatel was the subject of two judgements of the Court of Appeal (4 October 2006 and 15 February 2008) following an appeal filed by Belgacom, as well as two other judgements from the same Court at the same dates (4 October 2006 and 15 February 2008) following an appeal filed by Versatel

This decision on the 2005 BROBA offer was partially annulled by a judgement of the Brussels Court of Appeal on 11 May 2007. The appeal in cassation lodged by Belgacom against this judgement was rejected by the Court on 25 June 2010

This decision is about the 2005 BRUO offer. Two judgements of the Brussels Court of Appeal and a judgement of the Court of Cassation were delivered about it following appeals lodged by Belgacom and Mobistar.

This decision is about “Improved SLAs”. Following an appeal lodged by Belgacom, two interlocutory judgements were delivered about it by the Court of Appeal.

This decision on the tariffs for “tie cables” and splitters was annulled by the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 15 May 2006 following an appeal lodged by Belgacom.

This decision on access services for numbers associated with value-added services was annulled by the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 21 September 2007 following an appeal filed by Belgacom.