The Belgian legislation imposes a number of obligations in terms of transparency on electronic communications operators. The obligations vary depending on the type of operator, for instance an Internet access service provider, a provider of interpersonal communication services, a provider of transmission services for providing broadcasting or M2M services. The obligations are summarised below.
For more details, we invite you to read Articles 108 to 112 of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications (hereinafter “ECA”).
Contracts
Art. 108 ECA
The majority of the contracts concluded between operators and consumers and the standard contracts concluded with micro companies, small companies, non-profit micro organisations or small non-profit organisations, shall specify in a clear and comprehensive manner the information listed in Article 108, § 1, of the ECA. This includes the operator’s identity and address, the information on the services provided and, if applicable, the rates applied as well as information on the duration of the contract.
In the case of Internet access contracts, the list should be read in conjunction with the explanation that should be provided according to Article 4 of the Open Internet Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and the BIPT Decision of 2 May 2017 regarding the communication of the speed of a fixed or mobile broadband connection.
The contract shall be updated each time it is amended.
Information from the list should be provided in a detailed and clear manner, prior to the actual conclusion of the contract and generally on a sustainable data support.
Additionally certain information has to be provided in a summary of the contract as well.
As a rule, this summary also has to be provided before concluding the contract (if not the contract can only become applicable once the consumer or protected business user has given his consent following receipt of the summary).
An implementing regulation of the European Commission determines which information has to be included in the contract summary.
The contract summary has to be legible and has to be drafted as concisely as possible.
Invoices (Article 110 ECA)
Basic invoice
The operator shall send to its customers a detailed basic invoice every three months.
This invoice:
- has to clearly mention the tariff simulator [LINK];
- has to mention if the contract has been concluded for a definite or an indefinite period and, where appropriate, at what date a residual value is no longer payable for the terminal equipment that is linked to the subscription, or at what date a termination fee is no longer payable (in case of a fixed-term contract);
- has to mention in a legible and explicit manner, in case of provision of internet access, the facilities offered to keep an e-mail address once the contract has been terminated, at least once a year.
- Each invoice has to mention the Easy Switch number, which is useful in case you switch fixed operators.
Here is an overview of the information which must be included in the invoices, based on the Ministerial Order of 12 November 2009:
- Per category of separate service:
- A description of the separate category of service that was provided during the reference period of the invoice or for which a payment in advance was asked;
- The number of times that the single tariff was applied during the reference period;
- The total amount invoiced;
- The possible discounts and promotional terms;
- The total amount of the invoice to pay;
- For any fixed-term contract, the expiration date of said contract.
More detailed invoice
A more detailed invoice, free of charge, on demand, will give detailed information on the calls and Internet consumption. The client may request this invoice when he/she desagrees with the amount to pay.
Mention of the most advantageous tariff plan
Articles 109 and 110/1 ECA
The operator has to indicate at least once a year on a durable medium which tariff plan would be most advantageous to the users based on their consumption profile.
In addition, the users may require the operator to indicate which tariff plan is the most advantageous for them. The operator has to answer within two weeks at the latest.
Information concerning tariff plans
Publication of information
Art. 111, §1 ECA
Providers of Internet access services and providers of interpersonal communication services subject to terms of use are obliged to publish comparable, clear, comprehensive and up-to-date transparent information as listed in Article 111, § 1, of the ECA, per service and if necessary, per tariff plan. This includes contact details, description of the services, aftersales, maintenance services and customer services provided, general terms and conditions, information for disabled end-users, information on access to the emergency services and information on complaint handling, among which about the complaint handling with the operator in the first place and with the Office of the Ombudsman for Telecommunications afterwards.
At the request of the BIPT, operators have to notify the BIPT of the information they will publish in advance for the BIPT to be able to validate the information or to request the necessary adaptations.
Tariff simulator
Art. 111, §2, ECA - besttariff.be - Royal Decree of 2 September 2018 on the automatic link between the consumption profile and the electronic tariff comparison application on the website of the Institute
Within the framework of the implementation of BIPT’s tariff simulator, each operator shall input its tariff plans, as well as their modifications, in the electronic tariff comparison application on BIPT’s website at least 15 working days prior to their publication. At the same time, the operator shall provide the Institute with a comprehensive description of any new tariff plan, any change to a tariff plan as well as an electronic link to the web page describing the tariff plan concerned.
- Consultation at the request of the minister responsible for telecommunications regarding the automation of the tariff simulator
- Request for Information (RFI) about the future of BIPT's tariff simulator
- Communication of 22 April 2014 regarding the summary of the contributions made within the framework of the consultation of 16/01/2014 on the evolution of the tariff simulator www.besttariff.be
- Consultation of 16 january 2014 regarding the evolution of tariff simulator
Alert mechanisms
Art. 112 ECA - Royal Decree of 9 July 2013 on alert messages aiming at controlling the costs of electronic communications services - Decision of 20 November 2012 regarding the maximum amounts to be proposed by operators to their customers in accordance with Article 112 of the Act on electronic communications
The law provides for the implementation of a mechanism, offered by operators, allowing customers to check the cost of electronic communications services.
Here are the main characteristics of this mechanism:
- It concerns post-paid mobile telephony;
- It provides for a double alert: the first one concerning the subscription fee and the second one concerning a cap on top of the subscription fee, that the customer must define with his/her operator;
- By default, this cap is set at € 50, VAT included (on top of the subscription fee), but other caps can be set (see the BIPT Council Decision of 20 November 2012, page 5).
- Consultation on the preliminary draft royal decree amending the royal decree of 9 July 2013 on alert messages aiming at controlling the costs of electronic communications services
- Consultation on sending free alerts to consumers
Documents
- Summary of the contributions to the consultation on the modification of profiles for the comparison of prices for residential customers
- Consultation of 12 January 2018 on the modification of profiles for teh national and international comparison of prices for residential customers
- Decision of 28 November 2017 imposing an administrative penalty upon Lycamobile for non-compliance with Article 136 ECA and Article 43bis, § 5, of the Act of 21 March 1991
- Communication of 14 December 2017 regarding the tariff conditions 078 numbers have to meet in order to be used by the B2C companies’ customer services
- Non-confidential version of the decision of 12 October 2017 imposing an administrative penalty upon Coditel Brabant BVBA for non-compliance with article 4/1 of the ministerial order of 12 November 2009 fixing the level of detail of the detailed basic invoice regarding electronic communications
- Non-confidential version of the decision of 12 October 2017 imposing an administrative penalty upon Orange Belgium NV for non-compliance with article 4/1 of the ministerial order of 12 November 2009 fixing the level of detail of the detailed basic invoice regarding electronic communications
- Final report for an ex-post impact assessment of the Belgian federal regulation regarding consumer protection in electronic communications law
- Non-confidential version of the decision of 27 April 2017 imposing an administrative penalty upon Nethys for non-compliance with article 4/1 of the ministerial order of 12 November 2009 fixing the level of detail of the detailed basic invoice regarding electronic communications
- Non-confidential version of the decision of 27 April 2017 imposing an administrative penalty upon Brutélé for non-compliance with article 4/1 of the ministerial order of 12 November 2009 fixing the level of detail of the detailed basic invoice regarding electronic communications
- Decision of 2 may 2017 regarding the communication of the speed of a fixed or mobile broadband connection
- Decision of 4 November 2016 on the confidential nature of the decision of 23 August 2016 imposing an administrative penalty upon EDPnet for non-compliance with Article 111/3, §§ 1 and 3, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Decision of 23 August 2016 imposing an administrative penalty upon EDPnet for non-compliance with Article 111/3, §§ 1 and 3, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Decision of 28 September 2016 imposing an administrative penalty upon Scarlet Belgium NV for non-compliance with Article 108, § 2, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Decision of 16 august 2016 on the information operators provide to the consumers on their user profile
- Consultation concerning a draft decision about the communication of the speed of fixed and mobile broadband connections
- Communication of 21 April 2016 on the verification of the transparency of the Internet traffic management measures in 2015 - Verification of the observance of Article 113, § 5, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Consultation regarding the decision concerning the information provided by operators to consumers and end-users in order to enable them to make an independent evaluation of the cost of alternative usage patterns (article 111, § 3, of the Electronic Communications Act)
- Decision of 15 July 2015 regarding the quality of service indicators
- Consultation of 1 June 2015 regarding the draft regulations facilitating switching fixed line operator and bundles
- Consultation on the draft decision on quality of service indicators
- Communication of 16 December 2014 regarding the monitoring of compliance with Articles 122 and 123 of the ECA
- Decision of 21 November 2014 on introducing a tariff warning message that precedes calls to 070 numbers
- Communication of 23 September 2014 regarding the check of the operator’s general conditions
- Consultation about a draft decision on introducing a tariff warning message that precedes calls to 070 numbers
- Decision of 28 January 2014 imposing an administrative fine upon Schedom Dommel for non-compliance with Articles 108, § 1, b), sections 3 and 5, 108, § 1, f), 108, § 2, 110, § 1 and 111/3, §§ 1 and 3, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- National benchmarking of the telecommunications services rates in Belgium [Rates applied on 3 February 2014]
- Consultation on the draft guidelines for the interpretation of the term "subscriber with more than 5 numbers"
- National comparison of tariffs for telecommunications services in Belgium [tariffs applied on 3 June 2013]
- Decision of 31 January 2013 imposing an administrative penalty upon Scarlet for non-compliance with Article 4 of the Ministerial Order of 12 November 2009 fixing the level of detail of the detailed basic invoice regarding electronic communications
- Decision of 31 January 2013 imposing an administrative penalty upon Telenet for non-compliance with Article 110, § 4, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Decision of 31 January 2013 imposing an administrative penalty upon Mobistar for non-compliance with Article 110, § 4, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Decision of 4 December 2012 concerning communication of the speed of fixed broadband connection
- Decision of 20 November 2012 on the lit of limits operators must offer their customers as stipulated in Article 112 of the Law on Electronic Communications
- Communication of 23 November 2012 regarding the verification of the operators’ compliance with the legal provisions regarding the information of consumers on the duration of the contracts carried out by BIPT in October 2012
- Consultation on the draft decision laying down the exact requirements and the format for the notification aimed at in Article 108, § 2, of the Act of 13 June 2005 and Article 6, § 2, of the Act of 15 May 2007
- Consultation of 12 September 2012 regarding the draft decision concerning the information provided by operators to consumers and end-users in order to enable them to make an independent evaluation of the using cost of alternative tariff plans (article 111, § 3, of the Act concerning electronic communications)
- Consultation on the method for calculation of the download speed of a fixed broadband connection
- Communication of 5 June 2012 regarding the targeted checks of operators’ respect of specific measures regarding the protection of consumers carried out by BIPT in 2011
- Decision of 31 January 2012 regarding Telenet's request of 7 December 2011 to remove additional passages from the non-confidential version of the decision of 29 November 2011 imposing an administrative fine on Telenet
- Decision of 29 November 2011 imposing an administrative fine on Telenet for non-compliance with Article 108, § 2, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Opinion of 25 October 2011 on the legislative proposal amending the act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications in order to combat over-indebtedness resulting from debts related to mobile phone use
- Consultation of 4 August 2011 on the legislative proposal amending the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications in order to suppress over-indebtedness resulting from debts through the use of GSM
- Decision of 28 June 2010 imposing an administrative fine upon Belgacom for non-compliance with Article 108, § 2, of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Decision of 14 October 2009 concerning the provision of information to enable consumers to make an independent evaluation of the cost of alternative usage patterns
- Draft decision of 17 June 2009 concerning the provision of information to enable consumers to make an independent evaluation of the cost of alternative usage patterns
- Decision of 3 April 2008 regarding Art. 113 "quality indicators"
- Consultation summary draft decision Art. 113 "quality indicators"
- Draft decision of 8 October 2008 regarding the indicators on the quality of the electronic communications services as well as the content, the form and the manner of information to be published – case of indicator nr.4
- Decision of 3 April 2008 regarding Art. 113 "quality indicators", "mobile" case
- Consultation summary draft decision Art. 113 "quality indicators", "mobile" case
- Draft decision of 18 December 2007 regarding the indicators on the quality of the electronic communications services as well as the content, the form and the manner of information to be published – case of mobile operators
- Draft decision of 30 October 2007 on the quality of electronic communications services parameters, and the content, form and manner of information to be published
- Decision of 13 November 2007 on the publication of information regarding access to electronic communications networks and services, the use of these networks and services and the content and terms of publication of the information
- Consultation on the draft decision concerning the information regarding access to the electronic communications networks and services, the use of these networks and services and the content and terms of publication of the information
- Answer form regarding the questions asked in the letter of 20 June 2007 on the Articles 122, 124, 125 and 129 of the ECA
- Summary of the consultation of 13 February 2007 about the information on the access to the electronic communications networks and services and on the content and modalities of publication of it
- Questionnaire on the implementation of the Articles 108, 110, 114, 115, 116, 130 and 131 of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications
- Consultation of 13 February 2007 concerning the information regarding access to the electronic communications networks and services, the use of these networks and services
- Opinion of the “working group consisting of the Institute and the operators” on the framework and implementation of a software tool enabling the assessment of the best-value offer of electronic communications services
- Draft opinion of the working group consisting of the Institute and the operators on the framework and implementation of a tool enabling the assessment of the best-value offer of electronic communications services
- BIPT communication of 29 September 2006 regarding the postponement of the deadline of the national consultation concerning the indicators on the quality of electronic communications services parameters